Re: [PATCH] uevent: send events in correct order according to seqnum

On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 21:06, Andrew Vagin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The queue handling in the udev daemon assumes that the events are
> ordered.
>
> Before this patch uevent_seqnum is incremented under sequence_lock,
> than an event is send uner uevent_sock_mutex. I want to say that code
> contained a window between incrementing seqnum and sending an event.
>
> This patch locks uevent_sock_mutex before incrementing uevent_seqnum.

I think we can remove the spin_lock(&sequence_lock); entirely now, right?

Also the section with:
  seq = ++uevent_seqnum;
can just be:
  add_uevent_var(env, "SEQNUM=%llu", (unsigned long long) ++uevent_seqnum);
right?

And the:
  mutex_lock(&uevent_sock_mutex);
can just move outside of the _NET ifdef and we always use the mutex
instead of the spinlock?

That could look much simpler than the current code, I think.

Thanks,
Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html