Re: udev fork
Greg KH <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.hotplug.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 06:15:43PM +0000, [email protected] wrote: > On 11:05 Wed 12 Sep , Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 05:49:52PM +0000, [email protected] wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I know that many people do not like the way udev development went > > > recently, > > > > What specifically are you objecting to? > > Extra dependencies and L. Poettering's position that running udev > without systemd is a dead end and will not be supported in the future > (this seem to be already discussed here before). What dependencies? Run time? Build time? And why are dependencies bad? Do you have no ram in your system for them? Personally, I think running a Linux system without systemd is a deadend, but hey, what do I know about these things? :) > > > therefore we have a systemd-free fork of udev. > > > > udev works without systemd running on the system just fine for me, > > doesn't it for you? > > Call me paranoid, but I'm afraid that won't last long. Fear as a development motivator? That's odd, really? greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html