Re: Inhibiting plug and play

Phillip Susi <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.sysutils.systemd.devel,gmane.linux.hotplug.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 7/16/2013 1:23 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> So, Kay suggested we should use BSD file locks for this. i.e. all
> tools which want to turn off events for a device would take one on
> that specific device fd. As long as it is taken udev would not
> generate events. As soon as the BSD lock is released again it would
> recheck the device.
> 
> To me this sounds like a pretty clean thing to do. Locks usually
> suck, but for this purpose they appear to do exactly what they
> should, and most of the problematic things with them don't apply in
> this specific case.
> 
> Doing things way would be quite robust, as we have clean
> synchronization and the kernel will release the locks automatically
> when the owner dies.
> 
> Opinions?

Sounds like it might work.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJR5YRIAAoJEJrBOlT6nu75VLUH/3X7fHhppdUCw5WFt1PpitKK
O9tuPcs9RZBWhaQ+Ol9Sp82qnEG+mqmmCLAc3z35Zj1PpNRKTLYrGWbmqlbkPsks
ZU4UZTnr9i03uDRuQfSMtUsTpnriBILT8tfyPkH7XYulGBligI3D3Sdk6LWD6Y6J
tm0SnVlOk/tm4FasWFT4KlFp/obRuL8yUBnZvgYqyTblCeVTX2013xEtXN/TG9pH
4iNSgRTQ98K/EdZQP1yz2j/LSLn0MFQTCPU4YuDVmds9nU2iZAllaY+sSMQCSkm6
Ks4giagyhKsBw8oy3AAN5f/VEvpriuAAVrLxNNaTzTAfR//J7gHwzB40ploB3oo=
=+o3u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.