Re: [PATCHv3 1/5] ata: sata_dwc_460ex: use platform_get_irq()
[email protected] Thu, 09 Jul 2026 02:47:12 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ide |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider: - [Low] The patch removes the local variable `np` from `sata_dwc_probe()`, causing a build failure when `CONFIG_SATA_DWC_OLD_DMA` is enabled. -- --- Patch [1]: [PATCHv3 1/5] ata: sata_dwc_460ex: use platform_get_irq() --- commit 74bc1be9c4385029a4079d000bf78ff4452fc266 Author: Rosen Penev <[email protected]> ata: sata_dwc_460ex: use platform_get_irq() This commit replaces irq_of_parse_and_map() with platform_get_irq() in both sata_dwc_dma_init_old() and sata_dwc_probe(). It improves error handling for IRQs and removes the unnecessary include of of_irq.h. > diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c b/drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c > index 4fc22ce4bd9aa..442c6e9d06e0a 100644 > --- a/drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c > +++ b/drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c [ ... ] > @@ -1126,7 +1122,6 @@ static const struct ata_port_info sata_dwc_port_info[] = { > static int sata_dwc_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev) > { > struct device *dev = &ofdev->dev; > - struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; > struct sata_dwc_device *hsdev; > u32 idr, versionr; > char *ver = (char *)&versionr; [ ... ] > @@ -1173,11 +1168,9 @@ static int sata_dwc_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev) > sata_dwc_enable_interrupts(hsdev); > > /* Get SATA interrupt number */ > - irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 0); > - if (!irq) { > - dev_err(dev, "no SATA DMA irq\n"); > - return -ENODEV; > - } > + irq = platform_get_irq(ofdev, 0); > + if (irq < 0) > + return irq; > > #ifdef CONFIG_SATA_DWC_OLD_DMA > if (!of_property_present(np, "dmas")) { [Severity: Low] Will this cause a build failure when compiling with CONFIG_SATA_DWC_OLD_DMA enabled? The earlier hunk removes the declaration of the np variable, but it appears to still be referenced here in sata_dwc_probe(). Could dev->of_node be passed to of_property_present() instead to avoid an undeclared identifier error? -- Sashiko AI review ยท https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=1