Re: [PATCH 1/2] ata: use named initializers for acpi_device_id

On 4 August 2026 08:09:52 CEST, Pawel Zalewski <pzalewski@thegoodpenguin=2E=
co=2Euk> wrote:
>>I do kind of agree with Sashiko that ahci_seattle=2Ec could have been fi=
xed
>> in patch 1/2 (rather than fixing ahci_seattle=2Ec in patch 2/2)=2E
>
>Happy to refactor in V2 so that patch 2 would only deal with removing
>driver_data =3D 0
>in the ahci_seattle module=2E
>

I am usually the one who prefer things to be split into multiple patches=
=2E

But in this case, I think you can do everything in the same patch=2E

Still seems like the same logical change, clarifying/cleaning up the initi=
alizers=2E


Kind regards,
Niklas