Re: [PATCH v1] ata: libata-eh: Add timeout table entry for STANDBY IMMEDIATE
yangxingui <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ide,gmane.linux.kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, Niklas. On 2026/8/14 19:05, Niklas Cassel wrote: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 11:58:46AM +0800, Xingui Yang wrote: >> ATA_CMD_STANDBYNOW1 is not in the ata_eh_cmd_timeout_table and falls >> back to the 5s default (ATA_EH_CMD_DFL_TIMEOUT), which is too short >> for some drives to complete a STANDBY IMMEDIATE command issued from >> ata_dev_power_set_standby() via ata_exec_internal(): >> >> ata1.00: qc timeout after 5000 msecs (cmd 0xe0) >> ata1.00: STANDBY IMMEDIATE failed (err_mask=0x4) >> >> Reuse the existing ata_eh_flush_timeouts for this command, as a drive >> entering standby may need to flush its internal cache, making the flush >> timeout a natural fit. >> >> Signed-off-by: Xingui Yang <[email protected]> >> --- >> drivers/ata/libata-eh.c | 2 ++ >> include/linux/libata.h | 2 +- >> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c >> index 05df7ea6954a..8f9e12f460c3 100644 >> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c >> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c >> @@ -149,6 +149,8 @@ ata_eh_cmd_timeout_table[ATA_EH_CMD_TIMEOUT_TABLE_SIZE] = { >> .timeouts = ata_eh_flush_timeouts }, >> { .commands = CMDS(ATA_CMD_VERIFY), >> .timeouts = ata_eh_reset_timeouts }, >> + { .commands = CMDS(ATA_CMD_STANDBYNOW1), >> + .timeouts = ata_eh_flush_timeouts }, >> }; >> #undef CMDS >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/libata.h b/include/linux/libata.h >> index 96e626d6a7ca..6c0d385b2cde 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/libata.h >> +++ b/include/linux/libata.h >> @@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ enum { >> /* This should match the actual table size of >> * ata_eh_cmd_timeout_table in libata-eh.c. >> */ >> - ATA_EH_CMD_TIMEOUT_TABLE_SIZE = 8, >> + ATA_EH_CMD_TIMEOUT_TABLE_SIZE = 9, >> >> /* User visible DMA mask for DMA control. DO NOT renumber. */ >> ATA_DMA_MASK_ATA = (1 << 0), /* DMA on ATA Disk */ >> -- >> 2.43.0 >> > > This patch does not seem to be on top of latest Linus tree. > > If you look at latest Linus tree, it already has: > 1e024d2b41ee ("ata: libata-eh: Increase STANDBY IMMEDIATE timeout") > > Which looks to solve the same problem as this patch. Aha, thanks for the quick review! I usually base my work on the "for-next" branches of "kernel/git/jejb/scsi.git" and kernel/git/mkp/scsi.git", and I mistakenly thought there were no new changes in latest Linus tree. Thanks, Xingui .