(usagi-users 03370) Re: Any particular reason that IPV6_TCLASS/IPV6_RECVTCLASS is not implemented?

YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.ipv6.usagi.users
Organization USAGI Project
Message-ID <[email protected]>
In article <[email protected]> (at Mon, 6 Jun 2005 14:36:28 +0200 (CEST)), "Peder Chr. Norgaard" <[email protected]> says:

> Therefore I was pretty surprised to discover that the
> IPV6_TCLASS/IPV6_RECVTCLASS socket options are not implemented.  It
> doesn't strike me as a particularly difficult task - I would guess that
> the code from IPv4 could be copied more or less directly.
> 
> I intend to have a go at the task myself, but would like to have opinions
> first; after all, there may be some reason that it is more complicated
> than I think.

Well, we have some trivial code for linux-2.4, but it is not in 2.6, yet.
We could have ported that, but we haven't, because it is too trivial;
we should consider about interaction between tclass and flowlabel
configuration before doing that.

--yoshfuji
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.