(usagi-users 03827) Re: mip6d-daemon multiple interfaces

Hi,

On 3/21/07, Masahide NAKAMURA <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please find my comment inline:
>
> Monday 12 March 2007 22:14, Boutin Maël wrote:
> > >Can you show us more information just in case?
> > > o the kernel version; Please include git commit-id if you are using git tree
> > > o the oops log message if you can copy it
> >
> > Kernel version : 2.6.20.1
> >
>
> Please read below "Known issues".
>
> http://www.linux-ipv6.org/memo/mipv6/
>
> As described the above URL document, MN doesn't work on 2.6.20.1.

So which kernel version would you recommend ? 2.6.19 ?

>
>
> Friday 09 March 2007 22:34, Boutin Maël wrote:
> > I loaded mipv6-demon and there is a problem with the content of file
> > configuration (mip6d.conf) on mobile node side (MN) :
> >
> > With only one interface written into the file there is no problem. But when
> > I add an other interface (eth1) with a preference on eth0 in the mip6d.conf,
> > there is a kernel oops in the following situations:
> >
> > - If the home address are different on each interface, when i stop mipl
> > there is a kernel oops.
> >
> > - if the home address for the both interface is the same, a kernel oops
> > appears after sending some BUs.
>
> Finally I don't have kernel Oops at least when I've tested your two senario on
> following versions even MN does not work well.
> (Just I confirmed is that at one senario multiple HoA makes two BCEs on HA
> correctly and at the another the HoA makes one BCE on HA using the priority device.
> Packet sending is not tested.)
>
> kernel:
>         either kernel.org's 2.6.20.1, or
>         our git's linux-2.6-mip6, branch=linux-2.6.21-rc2-mip6
> daemon:
>         our git's mipv6-daemon, branch umip-20070307
>
> This is not a fix but can you try kernel without af_key.o since it seems that
> reading null pointer is caused at pfkey path which is not required
> if you want to test it even before MN basic behavior becomes stable?
>

Okay we will try that.
Another solution would be for us to use the MIPL2 official version.
However it does not compile on kernels which do not need the kernel
mipl patch. Is there a simple way to make it work on these kernels or
is it not possible at all ?

>
> Regards,
>
>
> --
> Masahide NAKAMURA
>

Regards,

Maël Boutin
--