Re: (usagi-users 04056) Re: ping6 is sent out from wrong interface
Naohiro Ooiwa <[email protected]> Thu, 26 Jun 2008 09:48:26 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.network,gmane.linux.ipv6.usagi.users,gmane.linux.ipv6.usagi.users |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Marcus Thank you for your comment. >> >> Thank you for your quick reply. >> >>> It's due to routing. >> For the reason of selecting 'eth0', I agree. >> But, I think the device is specified before looking up the >> routing table in this case. > > Well, ping's man page reads: > --- > -I interface address > Set source address to specified interface address. Argument > may be numeric IP address or name of device. When pinging > IPv6 link-local address this option is required. > --- > > So you only set the address, not the interface to be used for sending. Then, the man page doesn't match with the implementation. > >>> ...with eth0 being preferred over eth1 for multicast packets. >>> You could add a dedicated route for ff02::/16 to make the >> kernel output the packet via eth1. >> >> This works when using only "eth1" for multicasts. >> When multiple I/Fs are connected to separate networks, this >> scheme requires changing the route every time a user need to >> send ping to different network. >> > > Ok, my proposition was a bit too general. It would probably be better to set up routes for the exact addresses. So in your case to ff02::1. > > Of course, if you wish to send the same packet via several interfaces within a short time, this would still result in adding and deleting the routes over and over again. > >> I think kernel can solve this problem better. >> > > I don't think this would be intended.... > I was just confused by the difference of source address things between IPv4 and IPv6. Regards, Naohiro Ooiwa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html