Re: fax receiving in wrong page layout
Tobias Powalowski <tobias.powalowski-gM/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.isdn.i4l.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 23.05.2012 16:46, schrieb Christian Motschke: > Am 23.05.2012 um 12:00 schrieb isdn4linux-request-JX7+OpRa80SjiSfgN6Y1IbDXb76Qilz/@public.gmane.orge: > >> Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 22:35:57 +0200 >> From: Karsten Keil <[email protected]> >> To: Tobias Powalowski <tobias.powalowski-gM/[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: fax receiving in wrong page layout >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >> > Am 16.05.2012 09:39, schrieb Tobias Powalowski: > >>> Am 15.05.2012 16:07, schrieb Karsten Keil: > >>>> OK you can start the daemon with -k, the then temporary files > >>>> and directories are not deleted (default in /tmp/). Then you will > >>>> also see the .tif file from spandsp). > >>>> > >>>> The mISDNcapid flow is on receive: raw Bchannel data is piped to > >>>> spandsp, spandsp does everything and creates a tiff file, > >>>> depending which format CAPI did request (SFF or TIFF), it > >>>> transform the tiff file to SFF (default) or it send the TIFF data > >>>> directly via DATA_B3_IND to the application. > >>>> > >>>> So the bug could be in SPANDSP or in the SFF transformation > >>>> (most likely here). > >>>> > >>>> This week I'm on a business trip, so I can not test it. But I > >>>> think now that it is tracked down to fine/standard issue I maybe > >>>> can reproduce it in my lab later. > >>>> > >>> Hi here the result of my tests: - spandsp-0.0.5 is not compatible, > >>> build error on misdnuser - spandsp-0.0.6pre{18,19,20} work as > >>> attached in normal mode - spandsp-0.0.6_snapshots>=20120328 are not > >>> receiving anything, but send report is printed with success. > >>> > >>> Tiff files attached, the send and received one from /tmp looks imho > >>> ok but the transformed one from hylafax/recvq/ is wrong. > >>> > > Hopefully fixed now. The SFF generation had a wrong limit for the > decision about high/low vertical resolution. > > I tried the new version. I pulled the changes for isdn4k-utils and > mISDNuser and compiled them. mISDN has not changed, right? > > The error still exists, at least for me. > > > Karsten > Here it is fixed if I send the fax to myself, in fine and normal mode. Have to observe it tomorrow how it reacts on other fax machines. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa-fd97jBR+K/[email protected] _______________________________________________ isdn4linux mailing list [email protected] https://www.isdn4linux.de/mailman/listinfo/isdn4linux
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 554 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPvQhUAAoJEHcd9mJ+32gfrnIIAJTRKlwJRgauKvaeEkRqaNwo ec/iatchAFwOY+JAf8YQQUZ4lr7Dp+qLazf/VUhKOwpobpZ3qR3eAAIwoKDZdQm3 O7vEc24GBqJDtVblUn+cS/JUtiJk2zvBYUbGll23zUAHcdq3de6ndk16kEQJDBsL /LA8W6msKCStB1eB7DNfMRHZAkBZ7+Jz54CKaVSOHJHjTKkGR7WMnyT4TK5bDsMZ w5cVSuymK5jgf4oyCF1zVholq3Nopt8srhjXQUpqRvmXu1Y0C6rctGx/lxO1gW0S EYLh8QBGbzsS+0i3iJijAmxHjfwFSBEBchIyLr74tU6g/+wdybAcq/A3Qpsyu5Y= =5HNu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----