AW: asterisk 1.11 and chan_misdn

Hirschmüller, Sven <Sven.Hirschmueller-Xt/TTPqwsUlWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.isdn.i4l.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
It's still a hassle to get mISDN running in a new environment. (Kernel > 3.x.x) Meanwhile the guys from Digium add BRI-ISDN support to their dahdi driver and it runs quite well in the latest versions. They also added support for foreign HFC-S cards so you can get foreign cards like ones from openvox running quite easily. 

So if you don't need the low level mISDN interfaces as you only use asterisk you can use dahdi and counter a possible heart attack by trying to get mISDN running :)

On the other hand the dahdi drivers are performance pigs as they heavily use IRQs and you can get problems with your hardware because of that.

Only my 2 cent.

Sven

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: isdn4linux [mailto:isdn4linux-bounces-JX7+OpRa80SjiSfgN6Y1Ib39b6g2fGNp@public.gmane.org] Im Auftrag von Joerg Dorchain
Gesendet: Montag, 27. Mai 2013 09:41
An: Antonio Gallo AGX
Cc: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: asterisk 1.11 and chan_misdn

On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:56:28AM +0200, Antonio Gallo AGX wrote:
> 
> While i was compiling Asterisk 1.11 i noticed that it still has 
> chan_misdn in his source tree.
> 
> Is still this the chan_misdn that needed Kernel <= 2.6.32 and mISDN v1 ?

I would assume yes.

> 
> To add more confusion i've seen that into the asterisk's Changes file 
> Digium tells that they have forked their own version of mISDN 1.1.9.
> 
> What about instead the mISDN modules in kernel tree 3.2.x ?

They should work.

> are those the ones to be used with the chan_lcr instead?

lcr works with them (at least, for me)

Best regards,

Joerg
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.