Re: Asterisk 11, chan_lcr and chan_capi ready to use? anyone did it?
Tilman Schmidt <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.isdn.i4l.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 04.06.2013 16:31, schrieb Ralf Schlatterbeck: > If you have HFC-based hardware, you may want to use digium > chan_dahdi instead of chan_lcr or chan_capi. What about hardware that's not HFC-based? Does Asterisk not support these anymore? - -- Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: [email protected] Bonn, Germany Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits. Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlGuZ30ACgkQQ3+did9BuFsaKwCeK0XqXukReT/KEzBDcYOZz5/K BP0An3rHoVEunQx+pM4qubkMeBKjAkQl =fhAU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----