Re: [PATCH 0/3] ser_gigaset fixes

Hi Tilman,

On di, 2015-12-08 at 12:00 +0100, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> this series is the result of our discussion on the "freeing an
> active object" bug. I split my proposed patch into two patches
> for the separate topics of moving the ser_cardstate kfree() and
> dropping the useless kfree()s, and also included an unrelated
> patch (1/3) that had fallen through the cracks in my last series.
> 
> Patch 2/3 should go into stable releases all the way back to 2.6.32.
> It applies cleanly to release 3.*/4.* with at most offset 1.
> For release 2.6.32 there is a trivial merge conflict with a removed
> comment line.

1/3 ran into objections and, I think, Alan Cox is working on an
alternative for it. Would you mind resending 2/3 and 3/3 as a two
patches series? Feel free to add
    Acked-by: Paul Bolle <[email protected]>

to both.

(The previous gigaset series, which you sent in July this year, was
picked up from netdev directly by David Miller. Unless people actually
prefer these patches to also be signed-off by me, I'm perfectly fine
with that.)

Thanks,


Paul Bolle