Re: c2faxrecv-mISDNcapid
jugge <[email protected]> Sat, 3 Feb 2018 16:35:01 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.isdn.i4l.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 03.02.2018 um 14:25 schrieb Christoph Schulz: > > >> Feb 01 17:25:07 arch c2faxrecv[3038]: capi20.c: >> 164 CapiDebug():[capi20_isinstalled]: other loop - module: >> misdn >> Feb 01 17:25:07 arch c2faxrecv[3038]: capi20.c: >> 164 CapiDebug():[capi20_isinstalled]: capi_fd: -1 > > That's bad, because IsInstalled() returned an invalid file handle > (-1). That happens if mISDNcapid is not running, or more exactly, if > the corresponding UNIX socket cannot be opened (whose upstream path is > /var/run/mISDNcapid/sock). And mISDNcapid is perhaps not running > because /etc/capi20.conf did not contain the correct mISDN line, which > must be > > mISDN 0 1 1 > > or (shorter) > > mISDN 0 > > assuming you have only one ISDN controller (ID 0) that you plan to use > with mISDN. My /etc/capi20.conf: debugmask 0x13 - example default debuglevel mISDN 0 1 1 - first mISDN device is mapped to CAPI20 controller 1 and enabled mISDN 0 1 1 - second mISDN device is disabled for CAPI20 and yes I have only one controller. During my research I tried to start capid without a /etc/capi20.conf, cause I read that in this case both mISDN devices are enabled for the capi. But the result in loading c2faxrecv-mISDNcapid wasnt deifferent against the try with /etc/capi20.conf Thanks and regards Jürgen _______________________________________________ isdn4linux mailing list [email protected] https://www.isdn4linux.de/mailman/listinfo/isdn4linux