Re: [RFC PATCH v2 02/14] kcov: fix INIT_TRACK race in kcov_dataflow
Alexander Potapenko <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel.rust,gmane.linux.kbuild.devel,gmane.linux.kernel.mm,gmane.linux.kernel.workflows,gmane.linux.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAG_fn=XB7_zbjGzpgwEzm5dqcwehqvB+=SpJhHvw9QdETberAg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, Jun 12, 2026 at 9:25 AM Yunseong Kim <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Alexander, > > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 6:21 PM Yunseong Kim <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> [snip...] > >> Reported-by: sashiko-bot <[email protected]> > >> Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260603-kcov-dataflow-next-20260603-v2-0-fee0939de2c4%40est.tech > >> Signed-off-by: Yunseong Kim <[email protected]> > > > > Can we please avoid this? > > kcov_dataflow.c is being introduced in the same series, there is no > > need to send a buggy commit and a follow-up fix - just squash the two > > together and note the changes after Signed-off-by: separated by a > > triple dash. > > Thank you for your guide. I'll remove it in the next patch set. Also please make sure to update the patch version. It's really hard to distinguish between "[RFC PATCH v2 n/6]" and "[RFC PATCH v2 m/14]" when both series pop up in the inbox.