Re: [PATCH v4 08/12] mips: Get rid of custom mips ABIs for syscall tables

Em 12/08/2026 06:16, Arnd Bergmann escreveu:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2026, at 05:33, André Almeida wrote:
>> Get rid of the mips exclusive ABIs for the syscall tables and replace them
>> with the common ABI names, replacing n32 and o32 with 32 and n64 with 64.
>>
>> No functional change happens, but it simplifies and helps to unify the
>> tables.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: André Almeida <[email protected]>
> 
> I had expected you to use 'common' instead of '32' and '64' here. Since you
> did not combine the n32/n64 tables, this makes no practical difference,
> but it still makes the tables look different from all the other ones, and
> it means that the following patch to unify the tables is harder to
> validate since the inputs are still not line-identical.
> 
> Is there some reason you went with this approach?
> 
Ops, no good reason here, it was a mistake :) I will redo it to use 
common from [1, 211] syscalls. What about o32? Should I kept it as o32, 
giving that it doesn't make much difference?