Re: Rebuild from rawhide to F8 (when?)
Sebastian Vahl <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kde.redhat.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am Di 12.Februar 2008 schrieb Rex Dieter: > Sebastian Vahl wrote: > > Am Mo 11.Februar 2008 schrieb Rex Dieter: > >> Rex Dieter wrote: > >> > José Matos wrote: > >> >> My question is then what is your intention regarding the build for > >> >> F8? Are you waiting for the official announcement? > >> > > >> > Yes. > >> > >> OK, kde-4.0.1/f8 packages are now trickling into kde-redhat/unstable > >> repos. > > > > I've tried to create a live images based on [fedora], [updates] and > > [kde-redhat-unstable] today. It failed because yum cannot decide if it > > [uses > > kdebase4-4.0.0-2 (from [fedora]) or kdebase-4.0.1-3 form > > [kde-redhat-unstable]. > > > > So far I can see the Obsoletes are set correctly. But I I'm not entirely > > sure and just want to ask for a confirmation before I post this to > > livecd-list. > > Maybe add to kickstart: > -kdebase4 > ? It's a hack, of course. Also tried that. It's not working. > yum should be respecting the Obsoletes. It (yum) still seems to prefer > real packages over virtual/Provides'd ones. That seems to be th case. Sebastian ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBHsbD8fl3yM0Fq2EMRApoQAJ0e0wiqg53rzMEkfOvz/9t3FwtP0gCfcbBP eMS73rTjlQ4XwvRVuxWxv0w= =lWnZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----