Re: Criticism of F9 Fairness.

"Arthur Pemberton" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.kde.redhat.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Eli Wapniarski
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Everyone.
>
> I've been mostly staying out of this debate because I'm not a voting member.
> However, I must say that most of the criticism that I've read on the net has
> been quite fair regarding Fedora 9.
>
> While being experimental people rely on it also to get their work done.
> Problems with NVidia drivers, Xinerama problems with X Windows. (IMHO and
> with much appreciation to the very hard work everyone is putting into Fedora)
> a brain dead KDE 4.0x. And everyone caught in the same RH 8 mode of thinking
> that because its newer its got to be better.
>
> Bleeding edge thats great. But not so edgy that the users relying on the
> software start bleeding. We rely on and need our desktop to play games, do
> real work, surf the net, access information on computers and on the network
> etc.
>
> Please consider this when putting out Fedora 10. Maybe its time to slow down a
> little and take a breath huh? Just a little :).
>
> Eli


Why can't people read the prerelease announcement and make an educated
decision on if and when to upgrade?

-- 
Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
( www.pembo13.com )

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.