Re: KDE 4.1

On August 4, 2008 12:49:31 Rex Dieter wrote:
> > I noticed that you have a version in kde-testing dated 29.jul.08 but it
> > depends on libkcal.so.2, which is apparently unavailable.
>
> It's available from kdepim-libs-3.5.x.  If you're using kdepim(4) from
> unstable, you're out of luck, for now.  (at least until I come up with a
> better way of addressing this).
>
> kipi-plugins-0.1.x only works with digikam-0.9 (kde3), I assumed you
> were talking about digikam-0.10 (for kde4), sorry.  I'd been working on
> that lately.
>
> -- Rex

I'm confused about the digikam versions you mention. I have enabled kde-
unstable and kde-testing repos and I presume that's where I got 
digikam-0.9.4-2.fc9.i386 and the associated libkdcraw et al that I have 
installed, but kipi-plugins, although it also is in kde-stable, does not work 
with those.

I can wait for kipi-plugins. No panic.

While I mention the repos, I still have to use kde-unstable and kde-testing, 
don't I? There was some discussion about kde 4.1 now being in fedora testing, 
I think, so I don't have a clue where I'm downloading it from. Also, I noticed 
that in apt.kde-redhat.org, the 4.1 packages have moved from development to 
the fedora 9 directories. Do I need to adjust my kde.repo file, or will yum 
automatically find the new position of the 4.1 packages, when using kde-redhat?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/