Re: amarok betas?

Neal Becker wrote:
> On Monday 25 August 2008, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Neal Becker wrote:
>>> On Monday 25 August 2008, Florian Sievert wrote:
>>>> Hi Neal,
>>>>
>>>>> Are amarok betas available?
>>>> Amarok Beta 1 is already avaible in kde-unstable (1.90)
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Florian
>>> Updated: amarok.x86_64 0:1.90-1.fc9
>>> Complete!
>>> [nbecker@nbecker1 ~]$ amarok
>>> amarok: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/libamaroklib.so.1: undefined
>>> symbol: _ZN16QFileSystemModel5eventEP6QEvent
>> I've rev'd a newer 1.90-1.fc9.1 build that tightens deps a bit, to try to
>> avoid this kind of thing.
>>
> Transaction Check Error:
>   file /usr/share/qt4/translations/assistant_de.qm from install of 
> qt-4.4.1-2.fc9.x86_64 conflicts with file from package qt-4.3.5-2.fc9.i386                                                               
>   file /usr/share/qt4/translations/assistant_pl.qm from install of 
> qt-4.4.1-2.fc9.x86_64 conflicts with file from package qt-4.3.5-2.fc9.i386                                                               
> ... lots more
> 
> Seems we need qt-4.4.1.i386 also.

As I've mentioned before, kde-redhat repos don't do multilib.  If you're 
on x86_64 and want/need multilib, you need to fix it manually.

Fix by either fetching the i386 builds from i386 repo by either enabling 
the i386 repo or getting them by hand.

Or... just use fedora's updates-testing repo which *is* multilib'd.

-- Rex

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/