Re: keepalived may broke ipvs one-packet scheduling

Drunkard Zhang <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.keepalived.devel
Message-ID <CAJiejCThtDXV=WakyH7_Eyc4=oA=G+2a=cMR1oyx1oj1=c8ddw@mail.gmail.com>
Maybe I'm wrong, by explanation of Julian Anastasov, I think it's all
because keepalived's not supporting of --ops in ipvsadm.

2013/8/26 Drunkard Zhang <[email protected]>:
> If start keepalived before apply --ops of ipvsadm, the whole ipvs
> subsystem seems broken, here it is:
>
> 1. --ops not working, but the config in /proc/net/ip_vs all looks reasonable.
>
> 2. Conns and Conns/s in /proc/net/ip_vs_stats_percpu are always a
> fixed little number, but it's a counter, should always changing by
> traffic.
>
> 3. .ipvsadm -C doesn't fix it, but ./ipvsadm -C && rmmod ip_vs_wrr
> ip_vs && ./ipvsadm -R rules-with-ops" works
>
> Here's full story:
> http://archive.linuxvirtualserver.org/html/lvs-devel/2013-08/msg00064.html
>
> Here's extra information:
> I'm using keepalived-1.2.7 and git version of ipvsadm while tesing,
> and I'm using wrr as scheduling  algorithm.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introducing Performance Central, a new site from SourceForge and 
AppDynamics. Performance Central is your source for news, insights, 
analysis and resources for efficient Application Performance Management. 
Visit us today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897511&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.