Re: Ipv6 and preferred_lft
Mark Schouten <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.keepalived.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 08/29/2013 04:40 PM, Martinsson Patrik wrote: > Well the problem with using the bindo-parameter is exactly that the setting is not applied system-wide. > Now you will have two different behaviours, one with traffic going through keepalived, and another one with "regular system traffic" (eg. ping). > > So what you will get doing it that way is a correct behaviour regarding keepalived's traffic, however the system traffic (eg. a ping) would still end up sending a packet with the src-address of the last added vip. > In my opinion that is even more wrong. I agree. I think that when you want the VIP-address to be the source of traffic, you could distinguish that by setting a netmask other than /128. Wouldn't that be a perfect solution? By default, a VIP is added as /128 with preferred_lft 0, with a netmask it is added as a normal address.. -- Kerio Connect in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/ Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering KvK: 09218193 | http://www.tuxis.nl/ T: 0318 200208 | [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more! Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk