Re: bonding + VLANs
"Mark Lehrer" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.keepalived.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Is there a good explanation for this behaviour? What kind of behaviour are you seeing? I could swear that I have done this in the past, but it's been a couple of years. Thinking back a bit, I would have put each VLAN's interface into its own bridge instead of using the VLAN tagged interface directly. I'll bet that the VLAN tag names conflict with alias names at some level, e.g. maybe the ifcfg scripts or even keepalived can't deal with "eth1.144:vip1" -- but I'll bet a bridge would work. Can you add an alias to the vlan interface directly with the "ip" command? Thanks, Mark ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=190641631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk