Re: bonding + VLANs
Robert Sander <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.keepalived.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 18.02.2015 00:51, Sven Hartge wrote: > Please share your thought process which lead you to think it would not > work and why it worked in the end so that others may learn from the > experience you just had. I thought it would not work because both keepalived process got no VRRP messages from each other. Turned out that the firewalls were configured with specific IP addresses for VRRP that were not used by keepalived to send the updates. A quick search on the Internet returned mixed results, so I presumed that VLANs on top of bonding will not work. Regards -- Robert Sander gurubert.de ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=190641631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Keepalived-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/keepalived-devel
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 181 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlTkTWAACgkQkWYyMkX0yod51ACdHGZEwpTnYSgIh3GCXlCii0wM ZQMAnix+jfTo4XwdXJcqtkM/MC88YHeu =HTF8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----