Re: CentOS 7 and keepalived
"Pim Rupert (Lemonbit)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.keepalived.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Ryan, > On 26 Feb 2015, at 15:19, Ryan O'Hara <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The RHEL 6 load balancing manual contains extensive documentation >> for setting up LVS-DR. The RHEL 7 manual does not contain similar >> documentation regarding LVS-DR (layer 4 load balancing), because >> they now prefer you use HAproxy (layer 7 load balancing). However, >> LVS-DR should still work the same on CentOS 7. > > There is no preference for haproxy over LVS. Not sure why you think > this is the case. > > The LVS documentation should still be in the load balancer > guide. Can you give me a URL where you found this manual missing the > LVS documentation? My bad, you are correct. I think I was mistaken by not looking further at the other chapters. I got the impression that the RHEL 7 documentation leans towards setting up keepalived + haproxy as illustrated in the first chapter on https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/html/Load_Balancer_Administration/s1-lvs-block-diagram-VSA.html. - Pim ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/