Re: VRRP entering master state on both nodes in pair

Tore Anderson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.keepalived.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
* "Todd D. Taft" <[email protected]>

> Something isn't working as I would expect with my configuration, because 
> shortly after starting keepalived on either system, that system thinks 
> it's the master for both services (even when the other system is up).  
> As such, all requests for both services go to whichever system sent out 
> the arp packets most recently.

Hi Todd,

Check if they two hosts are seeing each others' VRRP advertisements,
for example with with "tcpdump -vni eth0 vrrp". If they don't, check if
your switch has multicast snooping enabled and if so try to disable it.

Do eth0 on both hosts have an IPv4 address/prefix configured that
encompasses 10.1.42.240 and .241? If not, try disabling uRPF with
"sysctl -w net/ipv4/conf/eth0/rp_filter=0".

Why do the instances in state MASTER have a lower priority than the
corresponding instance on the other node with state BACKUP? That seems
backwards to me. For what it's worth, I prefer to let all instances
start out with state BACKUP (they'll elect a master soon enough).

What is the purpose of your track_scripts? They seem to me to only ping
the local host, which should always succeed as long as the host is up,
right?

Tore

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises
http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_
source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.