Re: Keepalived: VRRP_Instance(VI_1) is ignoring received advertisement?

Hello,

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 05:40:04AM +0000, Rana Muhammad Waqas wrote:
>    I am trying to set up the nginx using the keepalived to make sure the high
>    availability of nginx, I have this configuration of the keepalived on
>    Machine 1
> 
>  ! Configuration File for keepalived
> 
>  vrrp_instance VI_1 {
>  state MASTER
>  interface eth0
>  virtual_router_id 51
>  priority 150
>  advert_int 1
>  authentication {
>      auth_type PASS
>      auth_pass 123
>  }
>  virtual_ipaddress {
>      192.168.1.132
>  }
>  }
> 
>    Machine 2
> 
>  ! Configuration File for keepalived
> 
>  vrrp_instance VI_1 {
>  state MASTER
>  interface eth0
>  virtual_router_id 51
>  priority 100
>  advert_int 1
>  authentication {
>      auth_type PASS
>      auth_pass 123
>  }
>  virtual_ipaddress {
>      192.168.1.132
>  }
>  }
> 
>    I have tried different virtual IP like 192.168.1.200 or different subnet
>    192.168.0.200 which is same on both machines like this [1]tutorial
>    says but It seems to have trouble which shows in /var/log/syslog
> 
>    The system logs are
> 
>  May 11 16:36:24 pc1-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[4514]:          VRRP_Instance(VI_1) ignoring received advertisment...
>  May 11 16:36:25 pc1-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[4514]: ip address associated with VRID not present in received packet : 192.168.1.132
>  May 11 16:36:25 pc1-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[4514]: one or more VIP associated with VRID mismatch actual MASTER advert
>  May 11 16:36:25 pc1-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[4514]: bogus VRRP packet received on eth0 !!!
>  May 11 16:36:25 pc1-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[4514]: VRRP_Instance(VI_1) ignoring received advertisment...
>  May 11 16:36:26 pc1-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[4514]: ip address associated with VRID not present in received packet : 192.168.1.132
>  May 11 16:36:26 pc1-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[4514]: one or more VIP associated with VRID mismatch actual MASTER advert
>  May 11 16:36:26 pc1-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[4514]: bogus VRRP packet received on eth0 !!!
> 
>    I am not sure what is causing this trouble, did some googling but couldnt
>    find much
> 

You have both machines set as MASTER. That's wrong. 
Actually both should be backup/slave on start, and let them figure out the master based on priorities.


-- Pasi


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud 
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y