Re: Keepalived: VRRP_Instance(VI_1) is ignoring received advertisement?
Rana Muhammad Waqas <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.keepalived.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAByghRNp_e20nZomFrJ8yxm4XC6MbqxbC7q4w=BqDrVeNY1Y7Q@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi, How do I check the iptables and see if it allow keepalived vrrp traffic? and if I see the logs it says May 11 16:36:24 pc1-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[4514]: VRRP_Instance(VI_1) ignoring received advertisment... May 11 16:36:25 pc1-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[4514]: ip address associated with VRID not present in received packet : 192.168.1.132 May 11 16:36:25 pc1-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[4514]: one or more VIP associated with VRID mismatch actual MASTER adver It looks that it is receiving the packets but something wrong with it On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 3:38 PM Pasi Kärkkäinen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 08:09:48AM +0000, Rana Muhammad Waqas wrote: > > Do you have any idea what I am doing wrong ? > > > > Is your iptables firewall properly configured, does it allow keepalived > vrrp traffic? > > > -- Pasi > > > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 12:09 PM Rana Muhammad Waqas > > <[1][email protected]> wrote: > > > > Thanks for reply, > > I have tried BACKUP on both machines and still it gives the same > kind of > > error in logs > > Machine 1 logs > > May 12 12:07:56 pc2-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[902]: bogus VRRP > packet > > received on eth0 !!! > > May 12 12:07:56 pc2-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[902]: > VRRP_Instance(VI_1) > > ignoring received advertisment... > > May 12 12:07:57 pc2-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[902]: ip address > > associated with VRID not present in received packet : 192.168.0.132 > > May 12 12:07:57 pc2-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[902]: one or more VIP > > associated with VRID mismatch actual MASTER advert > > May 12 12:07:57 pc2-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[902]: bogus VRRP > packet > > received on eth0 !!! > > May 12 12:07:57 pc2-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[902]: > VRRP_Instance(VI_1) > > ignoring received advertisment... > > May 12 12:07:57 pc2-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[902]: ip address > > associated with VRID not present in received packet : 192.168.0.132 > > May 12 12:07:57 pc2-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[902]: one or more VIP > > associated with VRID mismatch actual MASTER advert > > May 12 12:07:57 pc2-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[902]: bogus VRRP > packet > > received on eth0 !!! > > May 12 12:07:57 pc2-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[902]: > VRRP_Instance(VI_1) > > ignoring received advertisment... > > Machine 2 logs > > May 12 12:09:28 pc1-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[5319]: bogus VRRP > packet > > received on eth0 !!! > > May 12 12:09:28 pc1-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[5319]: > > VRRP_Instance(VI_1) ignoring received advertisment... > > May 12 12:09:29 pc1-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[5319]: ip address > > associated with VRID not present in received packet : 192.168.0.132 > > May 12 12:09:29 pc1-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[5319]: one or more > VIP > > associated with VRID mismatch actual MASTER advert > > May 12 12:09:29 pc1-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[5319]: bogus VRRP > packet > > received on eth0 !!! > > May 12 12:09:29 pc1-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[5319]: > > VRRP_Instance(VI_1) ignoring received advertisment... > > May 12 12:09:30 pc1-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[5319]: ip address > > associated with VRID not present in received packet : 192.168.0.132 > > May 12 12:09:30 pc1-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[5319]: one or more > VIP > > associated with VRID mismatch actual MASTER advert > > May 12 12:09:30 pc1-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[5319]: bogus VRRP > packet > > received on eth0 !!! > > May 12 12:09:30 pc1-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[5319]: > > VRRP_Instance(VI_1) ignoring received advertisment... > > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:04 AM Pasi KÀrkkÀinen <[2][email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 05:40:04AM +0000, Rana Muhammad Waqas > wrote: > > >  I am trying to set up the nginx using the keepalived to > make > > sure the high > > >  availability of nginx, I have this configuration of the > > keepalived on > > >  Machine 1 > > > > > > ! Configuration File for keepalived > > > > > > vrrp_instance VI_1 { > > > state MASTER > > > interface eth0 > > > virtual_router_id 51 > > > priority 150 > > > advert_int 1 > > > authentication { > > >   auth_type PASS > > >   auth_pass 123 > > > } > > > virtual_ipaddress { > > >   192.168.1.132 > > > } > > > } > > > > > >  Machine 2 > > > > > > ! Configuration File for keepalived > > > > > > vrrp_instance VI_1 { > > > state MASTER > > > interface eth0 > > > virtual_router_id 51 > > > priority 100 > > > advert_int 1 > > > authentication { > > >   auth_type PASS > > >   auth_pass 123 > > > } > > > virtual_ipaddress { > > >   192.168.1.132 > > > } > > > } > > > > > >  I have tried different virtual IP like 192.168.1.200 or > > different subnet > > >  192.168.0.200 which is same on both machines like thisÃ* > > [1]tutorial > > >  saysÃ* but It seems to have trouble which shows inÃ* > > /var/log/syslog > > > > > >  The system logs are > > > > > > May 11 16:36:24 pc1-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[4514]:   >  > >  VRRP_Instance(VI_1) ignoring received advertisment... > > > May 11 16:36:25 pc1-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[4514]: ip > address > > associated with VRID not present in received packet : > 192.168.1.132 > > > May 11 16:36:25 pc1-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[4514]: one or > more > > VIP associated with VRID mismatch actual MASTER advert > > > May 11 16:36:25 pc1-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[4514]: bogus > VRRP > > packet received on eth0 !!! > > > May 11 16:36:25 pc1-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[4514]: > > VRRP_Instance(VI_1) ignoring received advertisment... > > > May 11 16:36:26 pc1-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[4514]: ip > address > > associated with VRID not present in received packet : > 192.168.1.132 > > > May 11 16:36:26 pc1-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[4514]: one or > more > > VIP associated with VRID mismatch actual MASTER advert > > > May 11 16:36:26 pc1-VirtualBox Keepalived_vrrp[4514]: bogus > VRRP > > packet received on eth0 !!! > > > > > >  I am not sure what is causing this trouble, did some > googling > > but couldnt > > >  find much > > > > > > > You have both machines set as MASTER. That's wrong. > > Actually both should be backup/slave on start, and let them > figure out > > the master based on priorities. > > > > -- Pasi > > > > References > > > > Visible links > > 1. mailto:[email protected] > > 2. mailto:[email protected] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y _______________________________________________ Keepalived-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/keepalived-devel