Re: multiple instances, same vrid
Rafael Vanoni <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.keepalived.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Yes, that part is covered. There won't be overlapping subnets and vrids. Is this type of configuration anticipated by keepalived or should I expect problems? Thanks, Rafael On Tuesday, February 16, 2016 12:41 AM, Paul Slootman <[email protected]> wrote: On Tue 16 Feb 2016, Rafael Vanoni wrote: > I wanted to check whether it's okay to use the same virtual router id on different instances (each with their own interface and vips). Overall this seems to work but the behavior isn't consistent and I sometimes see log messages like this This is not OK. A router id needs to be unique on a broadcast domain (ie. subnet). It's what groups a set of servers into a logical cluster. Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Keepalived-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/keepalived-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140