Re: [Patch v9 02/10] block: Generalize chunk_sectors support as boundary support

Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.kernel.aio.general,gmane.linux.block,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.file-systems,gmane.linux.scsi,gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs,gmane.linux.kernel.io-uring
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 6/20/24 14:53, John Garry wrote:
> The purpose of the chunk_sectors limit is to ensure that a mergeble request
> fits within the boundary of the chunck_sector value.
> 
> Such a feature will be useful for other request_queue boundary limits, so
> generalize the chunk_sectors merge code.
> 
> This idea was proposed by Hannes Reinecke.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <[email protected]>
> ---
>   block/blk-merge.c      | 20 ++++++++++++++------
>   drivers/md/dm.c        |  2 +-
>   include/linux/blkdev.h | 13 +++++++------
>   3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]>

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                  Kernel Storage Architect
[email protected]                                +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-aio' in
the body to [email protected].  For more info on Linux AIO,
see: http://www.kvack.org/aio/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]">[email protected]</a>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.