Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] FDP and per-io hints
Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel.aio.general,gmane.linux.file-systems,gmane.linux.kernel.io-uring,gmane.linux.block |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 02:22:32PM +0200, Javier Gonzalez wrote: > Passthru is great for prototyping and getting insights on end-to-end > applicability. We see though that it is difficult to get a full solution > based on it, unless people implement a use-space layer tailored to their > use-case (e.g., a version SPDK's bdev). After the POC phase, most folks > that can use passthru prefer to move to block - with a validated > use-case it should be easier to get things upstream. > > This is exactly where we are now. That's a lot of marketing babble :) What exact thing is missing from the passthrough interface when using say spdx over io_uring? > If you saw the comments from Christian on the inode space, there are a > few plumbing challenges. Do you have any patches we could look at? I'm not sure what you refer to here. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-aio' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux AIO, see: http://www.kvack.org/aio/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]">[email protected]</a>