[PATCH v3 08/14] cgroup: Remove redundant rcu_read_lock/unlock() in spin_lock

pengdonglin <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.kernel.aio.general,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.nfs,gmane.linux.file-systems,gmane.linux.kernel.lsm,gmane.linux.network,gmane.comp.freedesktop.xorg.drivers.intel,gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general,gmane.linux.acpi.devel,gmane.linux.kernel.cgroups
Message-ID <[email protected]>
From: pengdonglin <[email protected]>

Since commit a8bb74acd8efe ("rcu: Consolidate RCU-sched update-side function definitions")
there is no difference between rcu_read_lock(), rcu_read_lock_bh() and
rcu_read_lock_sched() in terms of RCU read section and the relevant grace
period. That means that spin_lock(), which implies rcu_read_lock_sched(),
also implies rcu_read_lock().

There is no need no explicitly start a RCU read section if one has already
been started implicitly by spin_lock().

Simplify the code and remove the inner rcu_read_lock() invocation.

Cc: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>
Cc: Waiman Long <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: pengdonglin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: pengdonglin <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c | 2 --
 kernel/cgroup/debug.c  | 4 ----
 2 files changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
index 312c6a8b55bb..db9e00a559df 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
@@ -2944,14 +2944,12 @@ int cgroup_attach_task(struct cgroup *dst_cgrp, struct task_struct *leader,
 
 	/* look up all src csets */
 	spin_lock_irq(&css_set_lock);
-	rcu_read_lock();
 	task = leader;
 	do {
 		cgroup_migrate_add_src(task_css_set(task), dst_cgrp, &mgctx);
 		if (!threadgroup)
 			break;
 	} while_each_thread(leader, task);
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 	spin_unlock_irq(&css_set_lock);
 
 	/* prepare dst csets and commit */
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/debug.c b/kernel/cgroup/debug.c
index 80aa3f027ac3..81ea38dd6f9d 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/debug.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/debug.c
@@ -49,7 +49,6 @@ static int current_css_set_read(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
 	spin_lock_irq(&css_set_lock);
-	rcu_read_lock();
 	cset = task_css_set(current);
 	refcnt = refcount_read(&cset->refcount);
 	seq_printf(seq, "css_set %pK %d", cset, refcnt);
@@ -67,7 +66,6 @@ static int current_css_set_read(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 		seq_printf(seq, "%2d: %-4s\t- %p[%d]\n", ss->id, ss->name,
 			  css, css->id);
 	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 	spin_unlock_irq(&css_set_lock);
 	cgroup_kn_unlock(of->kn);
 	return 0;
@@ -95,7 +93,6 @@ static int current_css_set_cg_links_read(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	spin_lock_irq(&css_set_lock);
-	rcu_read_lock();
 	cset = task_css_set(current);
 	list_for_each_entry(link, &cset->cgrp_links, cgrp_link) {
 		struct cgroup *c = link->cgrp;
@@ -104,7 +101,6 @@ static int current_css_set_cg_links_read(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 		seq_printf(seq, "Root %d group %s\n",
 			   c->root->hierarchy_id, name_buf);
 	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 	spin_unlock_irq(&css_set_lock);
 	kfree(name_buf);
 	return 0;
-- 
2.34.1


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-aio' in
the body to [email protected].  For more info on Linux AIO,
see: http://www.kvack.org/aio/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]">[email protected]</a>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.