Re: [PATCH 06/13] mm/vma: convert vm_pgprot_modify() to use vma_flags_t and rename
Lorenzo Stoakes <[email protected]> Thu, 2 Jul 2026 16:29:20 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.freedesktop.xorg.drivers.intel,gmane.linux.ports.mips,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.ports.ppc64.devel,gmane.comp.video.dri.devel,gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc,gmane.linux.ports.arm.msm,gmane.comp.freedesktop.xorg.drivers.freedreno,gmane.comp.freedesktop.xorg.nouveau,gmane.linux.ports.arm.rockchip,gmane.linux.ports.tegra,gmane.comp.emulators.xen.devel,gmane.linux.kernel.aio.general,gmane.linux.file-systems,gmane.linux.kernel.mm,gmane.linux.sound |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <akaC-xxNr8ZyN4aH@lucifer> |
On Thu, Jul 02, 2026 at 08:21:16PM +0800, Lance Yang wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 08:25:29PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > >Update vm_pgprot_modify() to use the new VMA flags type vma_flags_t, and > >rename to vma_pgprot_modify() accordingly. > > > >This is part of the ongoing work to convert vm_flags_t to vma_flags_t, in > >order to eliminate the arbitrary limit of the number of bits in a system > >word on available VMA flags. > > > >Update VMA userland tests accordingly, updating vma_set_page_prot() to no > >longer inline vma_pgprot_modify(), rather we can simply define > >vma_pgprot_modify() as a static inline function and the tests will pick it > >up from vma.h. > > > >No functional change intended. > > > >Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <[email protected]> > >--- > [...] > >diff --git a/mm/vma.h b/mm/vma.h > >index bcf0c2773449..6a8abb8ae937 100644 > >--- a/mm/vma.h > >+++ b/mm/vma.h > >@@ -522,9 +522,11 @@ static inline bool vma_wants_manual_pte_write_upgrade(struct vm_area_struct *vma > > } > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_MMU > >-static inline pgprot_t vm_pgprot_modify(pgprot_t oldprot, vm_flags_t vm_flags) > >+static inline pgprot_t vma_pgprot_modify(pgprot_t oldprot, vma_flags_t vma_flags) > > { > >- return pgprot_modify(oldprot, vm_get_page_prot(vm_flags)); > >+ const pgprot_t prot = vma_get_page_prot(vma_flags); > >+ > >+ return pgprot_modify(oldprot, prot); > > Nit: could this just stay as a single return? something like: > > return pgprot_modify(oldprot, vma_get_page_prot(vma_flags)); I feel it's a bit clearer this way, separating out the two, I know it's a super tiny difference but anyway :P > > Otherwise, LGTM, feel free to add: > > Reviewed-by: Lance Yang <[email protected]> Thanks! > > [...] Cheers, Lorenzo