Re: [PATCH] block: split out a new blk_plug.h helper
Johannes Thumshirn <[email protected]> Mon, 6 Jul 2026 08:47:08 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel.aio.general,gmane.linux.block,gmane.linux.file-systems,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel.io-uring,gmane.linux.kernel.mm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/6/26 8:45 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Jul 06, 2026 at 08:38:12AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: >> On 7/6/26 6:11 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>> diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h >>> index 9213a5716f95..20cb8ed7d987 100644 >>> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h >>> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h >>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ >>> #include <linux/types.h> >>> #include <linux/blk_types.h> >>> +#include <linux/blk_plug.h> >>> #include <linux/device.h> >>> #include <linux/list.h> >>> #include <linux/llist.h> >>> >> I know it's a lot of cross subsystem churn, but wouldn't it be cleaner to >> not include blk_plug.h in blkdev.h, but patch the update the consumers? A >> quick grep shows 68 files that would need updating and some you already >> have updated. > Right now blkdev.h needs the rq_list from it. So we'd need to move > that to linux/types.h or something first, which feels a bit iffy. > > And no, including blk_types.h in blk_plug.h is not a solution, > as that is still touched far too often. Ah sh*t I did miss rq_list. Fair enough. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <[email protected]> -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-aio' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux AIO, see: http://www.kvack.org/aio/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]">[email protected]</a>