Re: [Linux-cluster] Re: Re: [dcl_discussion] Clustersummit materials

On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 02:57, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2004-08-11T11:46:03,
>    Steven Dake <[email protected]> said:
> 
> > If we can't live with the cluster services in userland (although I'm
> > still not convinced), then atleast the group messaging protocol in the
> > kernel could be based upon 20 years of research in group messaging and
> > work properly under _all_ fault scenarios.
> 
> Right. Another important alternative maybe the Transis group
> communication suite, which has been released as GPL/LGPL now.
> 
> This all just highlights that we need to think about communication some
> more before we can tackle it sensibly, but of course I'll be glad if
> someone proves me wrong and Just Does It ;-)
> 

agreed...  Transis in kernel would be a fine alternative to openais gmi
in kernel.

Speaking of transis, is the code posted anywhere?  I'd like to have a
look.

Thanks
-steve
> 
> Sincerely,
>     Lars Marowsky-Brée <[email protected]>

_______________________________________________
cgl_discussion mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/cgl_discussion