Re: [cgl_specs] Multipath I/O requirement gap analysis.
Dave Olien <[email protected]> Wed, 15 Sep 2004 15:05:11 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel.carrier-grade |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ramesh, Looking over your gap analysis, it looks quite good. I've got a hardware setup here at OSDL that is similar to yours. In the next week, I'll be walking through an exercise similar to yours. I've got a system with two fibre channel switches, with a dual fabric, and two IBM FastT200 disk arrays configured as JBOD. If I come across any additions to your work, I'll post them. The DCL project has a need for gap analysis on multipath similar to that for CGL. I think that your gap analysis is a good one, and I'll move to have it included in the DCL documentation. If anyone else has interesting configurations to test, this would be a good time to give feed back. On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 10:16:22AM -0700, Caushik, Ramesh wrote: > Folks, > Please see attached report of my gap analysis of the > device-mapper based multipath I/O driver targeted towards the CGL 3.0 > AVL 8.1 Multipath I/O requirement. Look forward to your comments > and suggestions. Regards, > > <<Gap Analysis of the Multipath I_O.ZIP>> > Ramesh. > > "Views expressed are mine, and not those of Intel Corporation" > _______________________________________________ cgl_discussion mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/cgl_discussion