Re: Latest CGL security spec
John Cherry <[email protected]> Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:52:05 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel.carrier-grade |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--===============49526211114070851== Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 09:03 -0700, Cihula, Joseph wrote: > > Attached is the latest draft of the CGL security spec. > > I believe that there are only two open issues with it: > 1. There has been some debate about whether it should include > requirements for secure default settings (it currently does not). > While in principle I think that this is a good thing, I don't think > that this version of the specification is appropriate for it. This is > the first version of the CGL security specification and it will be > good just to get a solid set of base requirements out to the industry > before complicating it with default settings. Let's give the spec a chance and keep it as simple as possible for the first release. > Also, this spec will be part of the CGL 3.1 release, which is just an > incremental release (mainly to include security) and so impacting the > rest of the specs (as the defaults would cover requirements in those > specs as well) is probably not advised for a point release. It would be difficult to impact the other specifications at this point in time. > That said, I'm open to opinions. > > 2. SEC.3.1 Log Integrity and Origin Authentication does not have any > PoCs that are more recently active than 2003. It was a P1 requirement > from the CGL 2.0 spec. I propose that it be moved to the roadmap > section due to lack of PoC activity. Moving SEC.3.1 to the roadmap section should be a proposal for the f2f meeting in Paris. The rationale at this point in time would be that there is no development going on with this capability. John > > (I would post a PDF version but Word can't format it correctly for > printing--tech writer to fix). > > Joseph Cihula > (Linux) Software Security Architect > Intel Corp. > > *** These opinions are not necessarily those of my employer *** > <<cgl_v31_draft_security v08.doc>> > > _______________________________________________ > cgl_discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/cgl_discussion --===============49526211114070851== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ cgl_discussion mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/cgl_discussion --===============49526211114070851==--