Re: [Clusters_sig] Re: [ANNOUNCE] Linux Cluster Summit 2005

Lars Marowsky-Bree <[email protected]> Tue, 31 May 2005 12:26:24 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.linux.file-systems,gmane.linux.redhat.cluster,gmane.linux.kernel.carrier-grade,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.cluster.ssic.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2005-05-21T09:29:01, Robert Wipfel <[email protected]> wrote:

> outside looking in, is web services an!  d grid.  Returning to the
> reality of many vendor's enterprise* business, the suitespot for h/a
> clusters still seems to be somewhere around ~8 dual-CPU nodes with
> many customers deploying multiple similar clusters. Nodes are never i=
n
> multiple clusters at once, rather, individual nodes are members of a
> cluster and that cluster might be a member of a cluster of clusters.

A single node must be big enough to support sane load balancing; ie, bi=
g
enough to run at least one (or more) "whole" resource entities / jobs.

That is the breaking point after which it is more sensible to deploy
more nodes - with looser coupling - than making a single node / SSI
component larger, because decoupled operation means less complexity for
fault isolation.


Sincerely,
    Lars Marowsky-Br=E9e <[email protected]>

--=20
High Availability & Clustering
SUSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - A Novell Business	 -- Charles Darwin
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel=
" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html