Re: [Clusters_sig] Re: [ANNOUNCE] Linux Cluster Summit 2005
Lars Marowsky-Bree <[email protected]> Tue, 31 May 2005 12:26:24 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.file-systems,gmane.linux.redhat.cluster,gmane.linux.kernel.carrier-grade,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.cluster.ssic.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2005-05-21T09:29:01, Robert Wipfel <[email protected]> wrote: > outside looking in, is web services an! d grid. Returning to the > reality of many vendor's enterprise* business, the suitespot for h/a > clusters still seems to be somewhere around ~8 dual-CPU nodes with > many customers deploying multiple similar clusters. Nodes are never i= n > multiple clusters at once, rather, individual nodes are members of a > cluster and that cluster might be a member of a cluster of clusters. A single node must be big enough to support sane load balancing; ie, bi= g enough to run at least one (or more) "whole" resource entities / jobs. That is the breaking point after which it is more sensible to deploy more nodes - with looser coupling - than making a single node / SSI component larger, because decoupled operation means less complexity for fault isolation. Sincerely, Lars Marowsky-Br=E9e <[email protected]> --=20 High Availability & Clustering SUSE Labs, Research and Development SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - A Novell Business -- Charles Darwin "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel= " in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html