sched/core: Fix DEBUG_SPINLOCK annotation for rq->lock
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <[email protected]> Thu, 15 Feb 2018 17:37:49 +0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel.commits.head |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Web: https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/269d599271fa604f09d5cb0093c5dd5d59964dd5 Commit: 269d599271fa604f09d5cb0093c5dd5d59964dd5 Parent: a7711602c7b79950ea437178f601b52ab08ef659 Refname: refs/heads/master Author: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> AuthorDate: Tue Feb 6 17:52:13 2018 +0100 Committer: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> CommitDate: Tue Feb 13 11:44:41 2018 +0100 sched/core: Fix DEBUG_SPINLOCK annotation for rq->lock Mark noticed that he had sporadic "spinlock recursion" warnings from the DEBUG_SPINLOCK code. Now rq->lock is special in that the owner changes in the middle of a context switch. It so happens that we fix up the lock.owner too late, @prev can run (remotely) the moment prev->on_cpu is cleared, this then allows @prev to again try and acquire this rq->lock and trigger this warning. So we have to switch lock.owner before clearing prev->on_cpu. Do this by moving the DEBUG_SPINLOCK annotation from after switch_to() to before switch_to() and collect all lockdep annotations there into prepare_lock_switch() to mirror the existing finish_lock_switch(). Debugged-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> --- kernel/sched/core.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index bf724c1952ea..e7c535eee0a6 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -2601,19 +2601,31 @@ static inline void finish_task(struct task_struct *prev) #endif } -static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq) +static inline void +prepare_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next, struct rq_flags *rf) { + /* + * Since the runqueue lock will be released by the next + * task (which is an invalid locking op but in the case + * of the scheduler it's an obvious special-case), so we + * do an early lockdep release here: + */ + rq_unpin_lock(rq, rf); + spin_release(&rq->lock.dep_map, 1, _THIS_IP_); #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK /* this is a valid case when another task releases the spinlock */ - rq->lock.owner = current; + rq->lock.owner = next; #endif +} + +static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq) +{ /* * If we are tracking spinlock dependencies then we have to * fix up the runqueue lock - which gets 'carried over' from * prev into current: */ spin_acquire(&rq->lock.dep_map, 0, 0, _THIS_IP_);