Re: KDB support for x86_64?

Hi.
On Monday 27 March 2006 11:32, Jack Vogel wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 08:00:46AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Sunday 26 March 2006 21:58, Peter Wainwright wrote:
> > > Is KDB still maintained for the x86_64 architecture? oss.sgi.com has
> > > x86_64 patches for kernel 2.6.14 but not for more recent
> > > kernels. I tried to forward-port it to 2.6.16 myself but it is
> > > not giving a proper backtrace (%rsp seems to be wrong at breakpoints).
> > >
> > > Peter Wainwright
> >
> > I would find it useful too. I've forward ported it as well, and also have
> > the same backtrace problem. I guess it's probably simple to fix, but it
> > doesn't irk me enough that I've bothered to try to fix it.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Nigel
>
> Did you have the problem with the last patch, there was
> some backtrace changes that I accepted that I did not have
> time to test. It would be useful if you could check a before
> and after of that code.

I've only had x86_64 for a few months, so haven't tried an earlier version of 
the patch. I'll see if I can find some time to try an older version this 
evening, if you like. Are the changes specific to one file?

Regards,

Nigel

-- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis --

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBEJ0LgN0y+n1M3mo0RAgvcAJ9cZpax6CPrTUQhqEb9j8pVUz49WwCeP2nw
uKyC0fwLIoZzzjYHlf/zyT0=
=tcbT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


---------------------------
Use http://oss.sgi.com/ecartis to modify your settings or to unsubscribe.