Re: [PATCH 0/13] RFC ONLY - kdb for kgdb

On 11/05/09  5:23 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:15:39AM +0200, Louis Rilling wrote:
> > Do you intend to support kdb modules? If yes, in which extent should they be
> > adapted?
> 
> I think that would be a very low priority.  What would be useful is the
> hack to load debuginfo into kdb so that it can pretty-print arbitrary
> structures.  That alone would replace about 90% of the kdb modules I
> think.
> 
> And yes, that code in current kdb is even more ugly than core kdb, so
> it would need a major cleanup first.

I was thinking about custom KDB modules, but I agree that most of them could be
replaced by pretty-print of arbitrary structures.

Thanks,

Louis

-- 
Dr Louis Rilling			Kerlabs
Skype: louis.rilling			Batiment Germanium
Phone: (+33|0) 6 80 89 08 23		80 avenue des Buttes de Coesmes
http://www.kerlabs.com/			35700 Rennes

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFKB/U6VKcRuvQ9Q1QRAtk2AKCPcnxS8OKwDKJetZurAhPF6Qf8zACfXyIp
RzR+q0YDW6WycbK4NZZcZUo=
=Ddqb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----