Re: Question about "Add scsi_debug_teardown loop in blockwise tests."

Ping?

Thanks,
Kun.

yangerkun wrote on 2018/12/27 16:42:
> Hi,
> 
> While we are testing fs with xfstests, generic/108 will fail at some 
> times with the reson that rmmod find the refcnt of scsi_debug module 
> isn't 0 by checking /proc/modules. And this your patch is really 
> describe the same thing. But, i am confusing about the scene as you said:
>   cleanup() {
>          if [ -d "$MNT_DIR" ] ; then
>              umount -f $MNT_DIR 2>/dev/null
>              rmdir $MNT_DIR 2>/dev/null
>          fi
>          rm -f $LOCAL_FILE 2> /dev/null
> -       udevadm settle >/dev/null 2>&1
> -       rmmod scsi_debug 2> /dev/null
> +       scsi_debug_teardown "$DEV" || exit 100
>   }
> 
> After the settle, all the event has been finish, so who will trigger the 
> scan, and how to scan? Can you help to explain this? Thanks a lot!
> 
> Thanks,
> Kun.

_______________________________________________
dm-crypt mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt