Re: unbound keys
Arno Wagner <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel.device-mapper.dm-crypt |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:49:41 CEST, Ondrej Kozina wrote: > Hi, > > On 3/30/20 10:17 PM, JT Morée wrote: > >After reading the luks2 FAQ, spec and archives I don't understand what an unbound key is used for. > > That's our never ending struggle to improve documentation and blog posts > coverage. Hope things get calmer after 2.4.0 release so that we can focus on > this effort. There is also the thing that the FAQ is LUKS1, not LUKS2. As LUKS1 is still widely in use, it would not be a good idea to take it down, buit ther is potential for confusion. I have made it even clearer now in the Wiki that it is not the LUKS2 FAQ. That does not exist at the moment. I expect that at some time it will be a good idea to make it dual-version with a marker of "LUKS", "LUKS2" or "LUKS+LUKS2" for each entry, but I think LUKS2 is still too fluid for that at the moment. Will existing features be stable after 2.4.0 or do you plan additional changes? Regards, Arno -- Arno Wagner, Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform., Email: [email protected] GnuPG: ID: CB5D9718 FP: 12D6 C03B 1B30 33BB 13CF B774 E35C 5FA1 CB5D 9718 ---- A good decision is based on knowledge and not on numbers. -- Plato If it's in the news, don't worry about it. The very definition of "news" is "something that hardly ever happens." -- Bruce Schneier _______________________________________________ dm-crypt mailing list [email protected] https://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt