Re: [PATCH v2 00/32] driver core: Constify API device_find_child() and adapt for various existing usages

James Bottomley <James.Bottomley-d9PhHud1JfjCXq6kfMZ53/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.iscsi.open-iscsi,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.comp.video.dri.devel,gmane.linux.ports.arm.mediatek,gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel.hwmon,gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure,gmane.linux.usb.general,gmane.linux.kernel.gpio,gmane.linux.network,gmane.linux.pwm,gmane.linux.kernel.firewire.devel,gmane.linux.serial,gmane.linux.sound,gmane.linux.scsi,gmane.linux.ports.sparc,gmane.linux.block,gmane.linux.kernel.efi
Message-ID <108c63c753f2f637a72c2e105ac138f80d4b0859.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
On Tue, 2024-12-03 at 22:56 +0800, Zijun Hu wrote:
> On 2024/12/3 22:07, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > On 2024-12-03 08:58:26-0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2024-12-03 at 21:02 +0800, Zijun Hu wrote:
> > > > On 2024/12/3 20:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 08:23:45PM +0800, Zijun Hu wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > > > or squash such patch series into a single patch ?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > various subsystem maintainers may not like squashing way.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Agreed, so look into either doing it in a bisectable way if
> > > > > at all possible.  As I don't see a full series here, I can't
> > > > > suggest how it needs to happen :(
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > let me send you a full series later and discuss how to solve
> > > > this issue.
> > > 
> > > It's only slightly more complex than what we normally do: modify
> > > all instances and then change the API.  In this case you have an
> > > additional problem because the prototype "const void *" will
> > > cause a mismatch if a function has "void *".  The easiest way to
> > > solve this is probably to make device_find_child a macro that
> > > coerces its function argument to having a non const "void *" and
> > > then passes off to the real function.  If you do that in the
> > > first patch, then you can constify all the consumers and finally
> > > remove the macro coercion in the last patch.
> > 
> > Casting function pointers like that should be detected and trapped
> > by control flow integrity checking (KCFI).
> > 
> > Another possibility would be to use a macro and _Generic to
> > dispatch to two different backing functions. See __BIN_ATTR() in
> > include/linux/sysfs.h for an inspiration.

That's way over complicated for this conversion: done properly there
should be no need for _Generic() compile time type matching at all.

> this way may fix building error issue but does not achieve our
> purpose. our purpose is that there are only constified
> device_find_child().
> 
> 
> > This also enables an incremental migration.
> 
> change the API prototype from:
> device_find_child(..., void *data_0, int (*match)(struct device *dev,
> void *data));
> 
> to:
> device_find_child(..., const void *data_0, int (*match)(struct device
> *dev, const void *data));
> 
> For @data_0,  void * -> const void * is okay.
> but for @match, the problem is function pointer type incompatibility.
> 
> there are two solutions base on discussions.
> 
> 1) squashing likewise Greg mentioned.
>    Do all of the "prep work" first, and then
>    do the const change at the very end, all at once.
> 
> 2)  as changing platform_driver's remove() prototype.
> Commit: e70140ba0d2b ("Get rid of 'remove_new' relic from platform
> driver struct")
> 
>  introduce extra device_find_child_new() which is constified  -> use
> *_new() replace ALL device_find_child() instances one by one -> 
> remove device_find_child() -> rename *_new() to device_find_child()
> once.

Why bother with the last step, which churns the entire code base again?
Why not call the new function device_find_child_const() and simply keep
it (it's descriptive of its function).  That way you can have a patch
series without merging and at the end simply remove the old function.

Regards,

James

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-iscsi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to open-iscsi+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/[email protected]
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/open-iscsi/108c63c753f2f637a72c2e105ac138f80d4b0859.camel%40HansenPartnership.com.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.