Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] firewire: Simplify storing pointers in device id struct
Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub) <[email protected]> Wed, 22 Apr 2026 12:10:25 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.sound,gmane.linux.kernel.firewire.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <aeicYlO0VNJB9m5K@monoceros> |
--lpqo3i3mqf5ctrqo Content-Type: text/plain; protected-headers=v1; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] firewire: Simplify storing pointers in device id struct MIME-Version: 1.0 On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 12:40:43PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 10:40:09AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig (The Capable= Hub) wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 10:30:24AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig (The Capab= le Hub) wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 10:19:21AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 04:07:42PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig (The C= apable Hub) wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 09:53:57PM +0900, Takashi Sakamoto wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 07:39:32PM +0200, Christian A. Ehrhardt= wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 06:08:16PM +0900, Takashi Sakamoto wr= ote: >=20 > ... >=20 > > > > > > Thanks for the references. It looks like there is not much to c= onsider > > > > > > outside of mm subsystem. But I have some concerns if supporting > > > > > > ARM/RISC-V adoptation of CHERI extension in Linux FireWire subs= ystem. > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > Any structures in UAPI header of this subsystem are defined with > > > > > > an assumption that the size of pointer in the existing System V > > > > > > architectures is up to 64 bits at most. We can see many usage of > > > > > > '__u64' type member for pointers (e.g. 'rom' in fw_cdev_get_info > > > > > > structure). I imagine to need defining specific structures for = this kind > > > > > > of 'fat' pointer. (The same assumption lays on compat ioctl.) > > > > >=20 > > > > > The Standard C answer to that is: The assumption that you can fit= a > > > > > pointer in an unsigned long or u64 is not generally justified. Th= is is > > > > > "only" given for all current Linux archtectures. And if you want = an > > > > > integer type to store a pointer, use uintptr_t. > > > >=20 > > > > No, please don't. Linus was clear about this. Use `unsigned long` i= n that case. > > >=20 > > > On CHERI we have sizeof(unsigned long) =3D 4 and sizeof(void *) =3D 8= , so > > > what Linus wants doesn't work. > >=20 > > Correction, we have sizeof(unsigned long) =3D 8 and sizeof(void *) =3D = 16 or > > course. >=20 > CHERI is not specified for 32-bit platforms? (Attention, half-knowledge alert; take the stuff I'm saying with a grain of salt.) There are 32bit riscv CHERI machines (even real hardware[1], while for 64 bit riscv there is currently only qemu and an expensive FPGA by Codasip), but a difficulty there is that there is >1 incompatible variant about the semantics of the additional pointer bits which makes working on that a bit more difficult and ugly. And I'm not aware of an effort to make Linux work on those. Also I believe that all users who want CHERI and Linux will stick to 64bit. Best regards Uwe [1] https://lowrisc.org/news/unveiling-sonata-affordable-cheri-hardware-for= -embedded-systems/ --lpqo3i3mqf5ctrqo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEP4GsaTp6HlmJrf7Tj4D7WH0S/k4FAmnono4ACgkQj4D7WH0S /k6YZQf9FUngrLtMCr92GyMX0DLthDD65eSi2ROyDx6P7CzGggQZgP1/WBa7dwgg 80pyPUF7K7juQkdYWLZq12SpRYGRraItX7p21mP0Ubv5VFxGZMTCbwUi5mSKOd0/ +Gabdj844qXtseKTPl8RiM7/n+7IbauFp44rr7l05FAUW9GVk6VSFvQhAXwVwIfI TJWshiTH9VQoi4ylpqneEksXynnUCcUc4kJwQN9P+wNVI4bTbb7lAY4JIQsrpATm U4HW/znVhyslzkRRz3yLDiOPPxPGsBE2+lVlJEWlR9QF/RFlnmy7Hl/dmGE/oJMA YZpeLnclkayY5MgunizbAjYaz07VMg== =s4rN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lpqo3i3mqf5ctrqo--