Re: [PATCH RESEND net-next] net/sun: Fix multiple typos in comments
Jakub Raczynski <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel.janitors,gmane.linux.network,gmane.linux.kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 06:03:22PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this > email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible. I should also implement any basic tools or AI to verify my writing skills. This patch was basically prepared with help of 'typos' script and yet has errors. > The "autonogotiation" to "autonegotiation" change looks correct, but > the neighbouring "in enabled" in the same sentence appears to be a > leftover grammar slip (should it read "is enabled"?). Since this > sentence is already being touched as part of the typo cleanup, would > it make sense to fix that at the same time? Probably, no reason to not do that. Might be good to also change double spaces > Neither "imperical" nor "emperical" is a correct English word; the > intended word is "empirical". Was the replacement here meant to be > "empirical"? Writing fail. Funny enough, I had someone read/check this before sending and it slipped. Will resend whole patch soon. Regards Jakub Raczynski