Re: ASoC: SOF: topology: Use more common error handling code in sof_link_load()

Mark Brown <[email protected]> Tue, 30 Jun 2026 19:16:34 +0100

Newsgroups	gmane.linux.sound,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel.janitors
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Tue, Jun 30, 2026 at 07:08:39PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:

> Will the chances grow that further development ideas also from my change selection
> can be integrated better?

Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
for review.  People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so 
on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
please allow at least a couple of weeks for review.  If there have been
review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.

Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at
all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed
directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are
some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches
for the subsystem are normally handled.

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 488 B)