Which tree to track: linux-next or staging?

Jonathan Bergh <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.kernel.kernelnewbies
Message-ID <CA+MPq=Xp9eqJ-88MdPdhwQUSK0fk11HNKDCUqj6yRMFau0krgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi

I have had the opportunity to submit a few patches, which has been
really fun. However, a while back i submitted patches for fixes that i
realised after had already been patched in GregKH tree ... and i
realised i had been developing against Linus's master branch, and not
linux-next.

But my question is, is it better to develop against linux-next or in
newbies cases, one of GregKH's (staging) branches? Maybe
staging/master or staging/staging-next?

If you develop against linux-next, dont you run a pretty big chance of
someone submitting to one of Greg's staging drivers prior to the merge
into linux-next, since patches go to drivers/staging seemingly a lot
more frequently than the merges into linux-next?

Thanks in advance
Cheers
Jon
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.