Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] security: add LSM blob and hooks for namespaces
Paul Moore <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel.lsm,gmane.linux.file-systems,gmane.linux.kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHC9VhSrYUWkt0_kbOdEuoeKdj+oSaFcY0Fg8t2SuUwH-=MJXA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Jul 9, 2026 at 11:58 AM Mickaël Salaün <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 09, 2026 at 09:03:58AM -0400, Paul Moore wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2026 at 5:12 AM Mickaël Salaün <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 08, 2026 at 11:22:17PM -0400, Paul Moore wrote: > > > > On May 27, 2026 =?UTF-8?q?Micka=C3=ABl=20Sala=C3=BCn?= <[email protected]> wrote: ... > > I'm aware of the new hook guidance, I was the one who documented it :) > > I know. I guess that means you're ok with that? Yes. Just a heads-up, and some of this depends on timing, but as we've got multiple patchsets (there is a SELinux patchset that depends on these hooks) I'll want to take this hook additions via the LSM tree. I can take the associated Landlock patches too if you like, or you base the Landlock tree off the LSM branch; no worries either way, we can sort out the details once the patchset is ready for merging. -- paul-moore.com