[PATCH v4 3/5] selftests/landlock: Test LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS
Justin Suess <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel.lsm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Check that a successful landlock_restrict_self(2) call with LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS sets no_new_privs without a prior prctl(2) call nor CAP_SYS_ADMIN, that a failed call from both an invalid ruleset and hitting the layer maximum leaves the attribute unchanged, and that LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC extends it to sibling threads. Also check that this flag requires a ruleset. Turn the multi_threaded_success test into a multi_threaded fixture with success, no_new_privs, and no_new_privs_max_layers variants to factor out the threading code. Finally, rename restrict_self_fd_logging_flags to restrict_self_fd_flags, and restrict_self_logging_flags to restrict_self_flags to indicate that non-logging flags are now tested. Signed-off-by: Justin Suess <[email protected]> --- Notes: v3->v4: - Turn multi_threaded_{success,no_new_privs,no_new_privs_max_layers} into variants of a multi_threaded fixture, per Mickaël's feedback. - Move the minimal ABI/flag checks into the previous patch. tools/testing/selftests/landlock/base_test.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++- tools/testing/selftests/landlock/tsync_test.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++--- 2 files changed, 168 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/base_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/base_test.c index 288d6bc19232..d20ab8f0862c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/base_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/base_test.c @@ -289,6 +289,41 @@ TEST(restrict_self_checks_ordering) ASSERT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd)); } +TEST(restrict_self_max_layers) +{ + const struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = { + .handled_access_fs = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_EXECUTE, + }; + struct landlock_path_beneath_attr path_beneath_attr = { + .allowed_access = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_EXECUTE, + .parent_fd = -1, + }; + const int ruleset_fd = + landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0); + ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd); + + path_beneath_attr.parent_fd = + open("/tmp", O_PATH | O_NOFOLLOW | O_DIRECTORY | O_CLOEXEC); + ASSERT_LE(0, path_beneath_attr.parent_fd); + ASSERT_EQ(0, landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_PATH_BENEATH, + &path_beneath_attr, 0)); + ASSERT_EQ(0, close(path_beneath_attr.parent_fd)); + + /* Enforces the maximum number of allowed layers. */ + for (int i = 0; i < LANDLOCK_MAX_NUM_LAYERS; i++) + ASSERT_EQ(0, landlock_restrict_self(ruleset_fd, 0)); + + /* Enforces one too many rulesets. */ + drop_caps(_metadata); + ASSERT_EQ(-1, landlock_restrict_self( + ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS)); + ASSERT_EQ(E2BIG, errno); + + /* Checks that the failed call did not set no_new_privs. */ + ASSERT_EQ(0, prctl(PR_GET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 0, 0, 0, 0)); + ASSERT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd)); +} + TEST(restrict_self_fd) { int fd; @@ -300,7 +335,7 @@ TEST(restrict_self_fd) EXPECT_EQ(EBADFD, errno); } -TEST(restrict_self_fd_logging_flags) +TEST(restrict_self_fd_flags) { int fd; @@ -314,9 +349,14 @@ TEST(restrict_self_fd_logging_flags) EXPECT_EQ(-1, landlock_restrict_self( fd, LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SUBDOMAINS_OFF)); EXPECT_EQ(EBADFD, errno); + + /* LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS requires a ruleset FD. */ + EXPECT_EQ(-1, landlock_restrict_self( + fd, LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS)); + EXPECT_EQ(EBADFD, errno); } -TEST(restrict_self_logging_flags) +TEST(restrict_self_flags) { const __u32 last_flag = LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS; @@ -361,6 +401,17 @@ TEST(restrict_self_logging_flags) LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_NEW_EXEC_ON)); EXPECT_EQ(EBADF, errno); + /* LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS requires a ruleset FD. */ + + EXPECT_EQ(-1, landlock_restrict_self( + -1, LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS)); + EXPECT_EQ(EBADF, errno); + + EXPECT_EQ(-1, landlock_restrict_self( + -1, LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SUBDOMAINS_OFF | + LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS)); + EXPECT_EQ(EBADF, errno); + /* Tests with an invalid ruleset_fd. */ EXPECT_EQ(-1, landlock_restrict_self( @@ -371,6 +422,37 @@ TEST(restrict_self_logging_flags) -1, LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SUBDOMAINS_OFF)); } +TEST(restrict_self_no_new_privs) +{ + const struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = { + .handled_access_fs = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_FILE, + }; + const int ruleset_fd = + landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0); + + ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd); + + /* + * The calling thread does not need CAP_SYS_ADMIN nor an explicit + * prctl(2) PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS call. + */ + drop_caps(_metadata); + ASSERT_EQ(0, prctl(PR_GET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 0, 0, 0, 0)); + + /* Checks that a failed call does not set no_new_privs. */ + EXPECT_EQ(-1, landlock_restrict_self( + -1, LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS)); + EXPECT_EQ(EBADF, errno); + EXPECT_EQ(0, prctl(PR_GET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 0, 0, 0, 0)); + + /* Checks that a successful call sets no_new_privs. */ + ASSERT_EQ(0, landlock_restrict_self( + ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS)); + EXPECT_EQ(1, prctl(PR_GET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 0, 0, 0, 0)); + + EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd)); +} + TEST(ruleset_fd_io) { struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = { diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/tsync_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/tsync_test.c index 9cf1491bbaaf..2b53596c986e 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/tsync_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/tsync_test.c @@ -62,32 +62,104 @@ static void *idle(void *data) pthread_cleanup_pop(1); } -TEST(multi_threaded_success) +FIXTURE(multi_threaded) { - pthread_t t1, t2; - bool no_new_privs1, no_new_privs2; - const int ruleset_fd = create_ruleset(_metadata); + int ruleset_fd; +}; + +FIXTURE_VARIANT(multi_threaded) +{ + const __u32 restrict_flags; + /* Sets no_new_privs with prctl(2) before the enforcement. */ + const bool prior_no_new_privs; + /* Enforces the maximum number of allowed layers beforehand. */ + const bool max_layers; + const int expected_errno; + /* Expected no_new_privs state of all threads after the call. */ + const bool expected_no_new_privs; +}; + +/* clang-format off */ +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(multi_threaded, success) { + /* clang-format on */ + .restrict_flags = LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC, + .prior_no_new_privs = true, + .expected_no_new_privs = true, +}; + +/* clang-format off */ +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(multi_threaded, no_new_privs) { + /* clang-format on */ + .restrict_flags = LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC | + LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS, + .expected_no_new_privs = true, +}; + +/* clang-format off */ +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(multi_threaded, no_new_privs_max_layers) { + /* clang-format on */ + .restrict_flags = LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC | + LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_NO_NEW_PRIVS, + .max_layers = true, + .expected_errno = E2BIG, + .expected_no_new_privs = false, +}; + +FIXTURE_SETUP(multi_threaded) +{ + self->ruleset_fd = create_ruleset(_metadata); + + if (variant->max_layers) { + /* Enforces the maximum number of allowed layers. */ + for (int i = 0; i < LANDLOCK_MAX_NUM_LAYERS; i++) + ASSERT_EQ(0, + landlock_restrict_self(self->ruleset_fd, 0)); + } disable_caps(_metadata); +} + +FIXTURE_TEARDOWN(multi_threaded) +{ + EXPECT_EQ(0, close(self->ruleset_fd)); +} + +TEST_F(multi_threaded, restrict) +{ + pthread_t t1, t2; + bool no_new_privs1, no_new_privs2; ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_create(&t1, NULL, idle, &no_new_privs1)); ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_create(&t2, NULL, idle, &no_new_privs2)); - ASSERT_EQ(0, prctl(PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 1, 0, 0, 0)); + if (variant->prior_no_new_privs) { + ASSERT_EQ(0, prctl(PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 1, 0, 0, 0)); + } else { + /* No prior prctl(2) PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS call. */ + ASSERT_EQ(0, prctl(PR_GET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 0, 0, 0, 0)); + } - EXPECT_EQ(0, landlock_restrict_self(ruleset_fd, - LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC)); + if (variant->expected_errno) { + EXPECT_EQ(-1, landlock_restrict_self(self->ruleset_fd, + variant->restrict_flags)); + EXPECT_EQ(variant->expected_errno, errno); + } else { + EXPECT_EQ(0, landlock_restrict_self(self->ruleset_fd, + variant->restrict_flags)); + } + + /* Checks the no_new_privs state of the calling thread. */ + EXPECT_EQ(variant->expected_no_new_privs, + prctl(PR_GET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 0, 0, 0, 0)); ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_cancel(t1)); ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_cancel(t2)); ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_join(t1, NULL)); ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_join(t2, NULL)); - /* The no_new_privs flag was implicitly enabled on all threads. */ - EXPECT_TRUE(no_new_privs1); - EXPECT_TRUE(no_new_privs2); - - EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd)); + /* Checks the no_new_privs state of the sibling threads. */ + EXPECT_EQ(variant->expected_no_new_privs, no_new_privs1); + EXPECT_EQ(variant->expected_no_new_privs, no_new_privs2); } TEST(multi_threaded_success_despite_diverging_domains) -- 2.55.0